skip to main | skip to sidebar

Info. Tech. Law

Information technology law: the internet, intellectual property and licensing.

Monday, May 21, 2007

Disclosing a public URL prompts non-lawyer nasty-gram...

... stating that a copy of a blog disclosing the URL has been turned over to the lawyers.

I can only imagine that the lawyer will probably not have a clue. Though, if he did, he'd probably give the client a really weird look.
Posted by Mike at 7:58 AM
Labels: blogs, lawsuits, nasty-grams

No comments:

Post a Comment

Newer Post Older Post Home
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2007 (60)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ▼  May (17)
      • If you're selling games in New York...
      • WARF responds to stem cell reexam...
      • New bill = new standards for IT in healthcare?
      • CAN-SPAM has few private remedies...
      • Disclosing a public URL prompts non-lawyer nasty-g...
      • Can spyware makers sue...
      • Can structured text...
      • Can you actually "delete" online predators?
      • Did KSR open the gates for many high-profile...
      • A "rainbow" of trouble...
      • Porn is fair use as Open Record...
      • Malkin + EFF + UMG + YouTUBE = DMCA fight
      • DMCA violation for NOT using a DRM system...
      • Internet jurisidiction...
      • The problem with the RIAA and RICO...
      • KSR fallout...
      • Google's Viacom response's...
    • ►  April (17)
    • ►  March (18)